Authorising engineer

HTM 03‑01 Annual Verification: The Numbers to Hit and the Evidence to Show

M&M Compliance Training

0280d2a7 9664 415b b1fb 462fea170f1b e1777988821776

Annual ventilation system performance verification failures cancel lists and erode confidence. This guide aims to set out in simple terms the thresholds to meet, the evidence to present, and who signs what under HTM 03‑01 and devolved nation guidance such as SHTM03/01.

Why conduct annual performance verification.

Ventilation performance verification is conducted to provide the healthcare provider with assurance that the system installed is operating in a satisfactory manner and does not present a hazard to patients and staff. Poorly maintained or sub-optimal performance can lead to increased health risks that are widely recognised. The Health and Safety at work Act etc 1974 places the following duties on employers/organisations:

2 (2) a. The provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health.

2 (2) e. The provision and maintenance of a working environment for his employees that is, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe, without risks to health, and adequate as regards facilities and arrangements for their welfare at work.

When to conduct annual performance verification.

All critical healthcare ventilation systems as designated by your healthcare providers ventilation safety group must be subjected to performance verification at least annually. Some complex and high-risk areas will require more frequent verification as determined necessary by risk management.

It is vitally important to ensure the safety of patients and staff during the shutdown and testing of ventilation systems. Your site Authorised Person (Ventilation) should co-ordinate with the user departments and agree the shutdown in writing through an “authorisation for disconnection” or “permit to work” procedure. Your healthcare providers ventilation safety group should provide guidance on permit to work procedures to be followed.

Lastly, the annual verification should be aligned with other annual maintenance activities such as fire damper testing, cleaning of wetted components and filter changes (if required) etc. Whilst conducted in the same shutdown, the performance testing should be conducted prior to the maintenance works to give a true indication of performance at the end of a maintenance cycle. Conducting maintenance first then achieving a close “pass” will not ensure suitable performance to the next verification.

Who should conduct annual performance verification

Ventilation performance measurement can be complex and involves the use of calibrated equipment and mathematical formulas to determine results. Historic use of grille correction factors can also add layers of further complexity that should be understood to provide accurate data. It is vital that internal staff or contractors are suitably qualified and experienced in this type of work and have deep understanding of the required standards to meet.

Your site based Authorised Person (Ventilation) should conduct and record a competency assessment of the proposed verification engineer before works are commenced. It is the responsibility of the verification engineer to prove competence to the Authorised Person (Ventilation) by way of skills, knowledge, attitude, training, and experience. Safety documentation such as “authorisation for disconnection” or “permit to work” may only be issued to a demonstrably competent person.

1) The hard numbers (existing in‑use systems)

Air‑change rates (measured at annual verification)

  • Operating theatre, UCV theatre or lay‑up prep room: ≥18 ac/h (HTM Part B 4.15a)
  • Anaesthetic room with N₂O/agents, or operating department recovery: ≥12 ac/h (HTM Part B 4.15b)
  • Other rooms using N₂O/agents: ≥8 ac/h (HTM Part B 4.15c)
  • All other clinical rooms: ≥80% of recommended ac/h (HTM Part B 4.16)
  • or 100% of its original design intent if lower*

*It is probable in existing healthcare facilities that ventilation systems were designed, installed, and commissioned to lower standards. Providing there has not been a change of use or treatments offered, a system that meets its design intent may be suitable for continued use. The healthcare providers ventilation safety group should be consulted where any doubt exists to the suitability of performance.

Pressure regime and direction

  • Maintain ≥80% of the design differential pressure and keep the clean‑to‑less‑clean gradient (HTM Part B 4.17)
  •  

Noise (service noise only)

  • Operating suite rooms (theatre, anaesthetic, scrub, prep, utility): ≤50 dB(A) (HTM Part B 4.18 & Table 2)
  •  

UCV theatres

  • Vertical canopies: average velocity at 2 m ≥0.38 m/s (partial/no wall) or ≥0.30 m/s (full wall); each quadrant within ±6%; inner‑zone at 1 m ≥0.20 m/s (HTM Part B 4.19; method per Part A Ch.12)
  • Horizontal terminals: average discharge velocity at 1/1.5/2 m ≥0.40 m/s (HTM Part B 4.22–4.23)
  • No filter scan/entrainment test at annual verification unless filters/fans are changed or the system is significantly disturbed (HTM Part B 4.20 Note; 4.23 Note)

 

Plain recap: meet the ac/h targets, keep pressure direction, stay within noise limits, and prove UCV velocities by the HTM method.

2) The evidence pack (have this ready)

  • Design baseline: as‑built drawings, design schedules, acceptance/validation report (Part A design context; Part B Appx 2 prompts)
  • Previous verification results: trend of 12–24 months; actions closed (Part B 4.15–4.18; Appx 2)
  • Controls and alarms: surgeon’s panel indications match measured values; modes and interlocks demonstrated (HTM Part B Appx 2 Qs 9–17; Q 24–25)
  • General condition: access, seals, pressure stabilisers, terminals, cleanliness, and fabric support the performance tests (HTM Part B 4.11; Appx 2)

 

Plain recap: show the baseline, show last year’s numbers, show fixes, and prove the controls.

3) Responsibilities and sign‑off (governance)

  • Designated Person: confirms appointments in writing (HTM Part B 2.7; 2.14)
  • AE(V): independent auditing/advice; reviews verification/validation and supports appointments (HTM Part B 2.8)
  • AP(V): day‑to‑day control of the Safe System of Work: permits, isolations, contractor control, reinstatement, and records (HTM Part B 2.9)
  • CP(V): performs maintenance and periodic testing to support verification (HTM Part B 2.10)
  • Ventilation Safety Group (VSG): oversees ventilation safety, resilience, and governance; reports to Board via the Designated Person (HTM Part B 2.16–2.18)

 

Plain recap: AE(V) advises, AP(V) controls, CP(V) tests, and the VSG provides governance.

4) Pre‑verification checklist (15‑minute desk review)

  • Confirm use and mode match the design intent (conventional vs UCV; agent use).
  • Check doors, seals, pressure stabilisers; remove obstructions that distort flow paths.
  • Confirm set‑back/occupancy modes and who may initiate them.
  • Align panel indications with calibrated instruments.
  • Assemble RAMS and permits for plant access and test points.
  • Pre‑agree hold points for UCV demonstrations and mode changes.
  • Ensure safe access to duct terminals and low‑level extracts for measurement.

 

Plain recap: fix avoidable before anyone opens a hood.

5) Common non‑conformances (and quick fixes)

  • Airflows below target → restore terminal settings; address fouling; re‑balance where needed.
  • Wrong pressure direction → reinstate door seals; clean/adjust stabilisers; confirm set‑back logic.
  • Panel ≠ reality → recalibrate sensors; verify scaling/ranges; correct mode permissions.
  • UCV interlocks not proven → schedule a witnessed test with AP(V) present.
  • High noise → check belts/bearings/duty; retest at normal operating mode.

 

Plain recap: most failures are preventable with basic housekeeping and alignment to the design.

6) Procurement note (write verification so it delivers)

Specify:

  • A test schedule covering ac/h, pressures, noise, controls, and UCV velocities (where fitted)
  • Room‑by‑room results against HTM targets and design values.
  • Defects list with risk rating and clear pass/fail per space.
  • Sign‑off by the AP(V) with AE(V) oversight through the VSG.

 

Plain recap: specify outputs you can defend, not just numbers.

Quick reference: theatre suite targets at annual verification

Item 

Target

HTM reference 

Theatre / UCV / lay‑up prep

≥18 ac/h

Part B 4.15a

Anaesthetic room / recovery

≥12 ac/h

Part B 4.15b

Rooms with N₂O/agents (other)

≥8 ac/h

Part B 4.15c

All other rooms

≥80% of design ac/h

Part B 4.16

Pressure regime

≥80% of design; gradient maintained

Part B 4.17

Operating suite noise

≤50 dB(A)

Part B4.12 &Table 2

UCV vertical canopy

0.38 m/s (partial/no wall) or 0.30 m/s (full wall); ±6% quadrant; inner zone 0.20 m/s

Part B 4.19; Part A Ch.12 method

UCV horizontal terminal

≥0.40 m/s average at 1/1.5/2 m

Part B 4.22–4.23

Filter scan at annual verification

Not required unless disturbed/changed

Part B 4.20 Note; 4.23 Note

Plain recap: these are the pass marks your report is judged against.

How M&M helps

Pre‑verification audit: brief review to de‑risk the visit.

Annual verification support: independent measurements, governance checks, clear pass/fail report.

AP(V) and CP(V) training: delivered by practising AE(V)s and aligned to local procedures and VSG governance.

Contact us

Need some help or have a question?

We’re here to support you. Just fill out the form and one of our team members will be in touch shortly to discuss your requirements.